Among our key findings:
- Unlike voting machines used in past eras, today’s systems were not
designed to last for decades. In part this is due to the pace of
technological change. No one expects a laptop to last for 10 years. And
although today’s machines debuted at the beginning of this century, many
were designed and engineered in the 1990s.
- While it is impossible to say how long any particular machine will
last, experts agree that for those purchased since 2000, the expected
lifespan for the core components of electronic voting machines is
between 10 and 20 years, and for most systems it is probably closer to
10 than 20.
- Forty-three states are using some machines
that will be at least 10 years old in 2016. In most of these states, the
majority of election districts are using machines that are at least 10
years old.
- In 14 states, machines will be 15 or more years old.
- Nearly every state is using some machines that are no longer manufactured and many election officials struggle to find replacement parts.
- Forty-three states are using some machines
that will be at least 10 years old in 2016. In most of these states, the
majority of election districts are using machines that are at least 10
years old.
- The longer we delay purchasing new equipment, the more problems we risk.
- The biggest risk is increased failures and crashes, which can lead to long lines and lost votes.
- Older machines can also have serious security and reliability flaws
that are unacceptable today. For example, Virginia recently decertified a
voting system used in 24 percent of precincts after finding that an
external party could access the machine’s wireless features to “record
voting data or inject malicious data.
- Smaller problems can also shake public confidence. Several election
officials mentioned “flipped votes” on touch screen machines, where a
voter touches the name of one candidate, but the machine registers it as
a selection for another.
- The biggest risk is increased failures and crashes, which can lead to long lines and lost votes.
- Election officials who believe they need to buy new machines do not have sufficient resources.
- Election jurisdictions in at least 31 states want to purchase new
voting machines in the next five years. Officials from 22 of these
states said they did not know where they would get the money to pay for
them.
- Based upon recent contracts and assessments provided by election
officials, the Brennan Center estimates the initial national cost of
replacing equipment over the next few years could exceed $1 billion,
though that could be partially offset by lower operating costs and
better contracts than are currently used in many jurisdictions.
- As election jurisdictions diverge in how they respond to the crisis,
we see an increasing divide among, and even within, states in the
ability to ensure elections can be conducted without system failures and
disruption.
- A preliminary analysis by the Brennan Center lends support to the concern expressed by some officials that without federal or state funding, wealthier counties will replace aging machines, while poorer counties will be forced to use them far longer than they should.
- Election jurisdictions in at least 31 states want to purchase new
voting machines in the next five years. Officials from 22 of these
states said they did not know where they would get the money to pay for
them.
No comments:
Post a Comment