Press Herald - Fusion
centers were created after the 9/11 terrorist attacks to increase
collaboration and intelligence gathering among all levels of law
enforcement. The agencies received at least $461 million in federal
funding last year and an estimated $1.4 billion through 2012, according
to federal grant data. They have been widely criticized for violating
Americans’ right to privacy and drafting intelligence reports on peace
activists, political groups and, in one case, a California motorcycle
gang’s distribution of a leaflet urging members to have a designated
driver and cooperate if stopped by police.
U.S. Senate investigators and the Government Accounting Office have
both issued critical reports about fusion centers, raising questions
about the scope of their activities and whether the public’s money was
being well spent.
The MIAC’s activities in Maine are largely covert. The agency is
overseen by Maine State Police, but its budget, the information it
collects and the exact makeup of its 12-member staff are not publicly
disclosed.
Zach Heiden, legal director for the ACLU of Maine, said his
organization has unsuccessfully tried to get more information about the
fusion center. He said a request for public records the ACLU submitted
under the Freedom of Access Act returned little useful information.
“I don’t think we got good answers,” he said. “We really don’t know much about it.”
That’s also been the experience with fusion centers in other states.
In 2010, the ACLU of Illinois petitioned the courts to compel the
Illinois State Police to respond to a Freedom of Information Act request
for records related to that state’s fusion center – the Illinois
Statewide Terrorism and Intelligence Center.
Nationally, the ACLU has advocated for changes to fusion centers. It
contends they have ambiguous authority, operate in secrecy, are active
in mining private citizens’ data and have put military personnel in
charge of law enforcement activities – possibly violating a federal law known as the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which limits how the federal government can use military personnel to enforce domestic law.
“Any time the government is collecting massive amounts of information
about citizens, that raises concerns,” Heiden said. “While that
information can be used for good, it can also be used in ways that
undermine people’s rights, whether it’s rights to free speech or to
associate. We know that fusion centers in other states have targeted
groups that are using their First Amendment rights – the Occupy
movement, Black Lives Matter – and that’s very troubling.”
He added, “Anytime that a government entity has an ill-defined
mission – and the war on drugs is nothing if not an ill-defined mission –
that creates potential problems.”
1 comment:
The war between the Union and CSA was between 2 nations. This war against the states eliminates dual sovereignty with the feds conquering the states.
Post a Comment