The word has become a synonym for “president.” It is said that we “elect a commander in chief.” It is asked whether this or that candidate is “worthy to be our commander in chief.”Wills recounts that Dwight Eisenhower, "a real general," would not exchange salutes while President, because saluting was for those in the military, not civilian Presidents. The practice of presidential saluting was begun by Ronald Reagan, who -- like our current President -- loved ceremonial displays of warrior courage and military power even though (more likely: because) he had none in his real history.
But the president is not our commander in chief. He certainly is not mine. I am not in the Army. . . .
Online report of the Progressive Review. Since 1964, the news while there's still time to do something about it.
March 10, 2015
The President: Public servant vs. military commander
Glenn Greenwald, 2007 - Garry Wills has an Op-Ed in the New York Times this morning criticizing the practice of constantly referring to the President as the "Commander-in-Chief":
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment