Mr Wilson declared he “would like to call attention to an excellent editorial in today’s Washington Post,
written by the newspaper’s editorial staff. They have presented a
definitive summary of why we must act to disarm Iraq in preserving the
safety of Americans.” And there then arose overwhelming national
support for what the WP called “justified military intervention.” The
paper carried 27 editorials supporting war on Iraq before the ‘Shock and
Awe’ onslaught began destruction of the country. In a mist of majestic
inanity its leader of February 5, 2003 declared that
a war in Iraq would not be primarily a humanitarian exercise but an operation essential to American security.Next day one of the WP’s columnists, Richard Cohen, wrote acerbically that
Iraq not only hasn’t accounted for its weapons of mass destruction but without a doubt still retains them. Only a fool — or possibly a Frenchman — could conclude otherwise.
No comments:
Post a Comment