December 29, 2014

The end of nuclear power in Vermont

Eco Watch - The Vermont Yankee atomic reactor goes permanently off-line .. Citizen activists have made it happen. The number of licensed U.S. commercial reactors is now under 100 where once it was to be 1,000.

Entergy says it shut Vermont Yankee because it was losing money. Though fully amortized, it could not compete with the onslaught of renewable energy and fracked-gas. Throughout the world, nukes once sold as generating juice “too cheap to meter” comprise a global financial disaster. Even with their capital costs long-ago stuck to the public, these radioactive junk heaps have no place in today’s economy—except as illegitimate magnets for massive handouts.

So in Illinois and elsewhere around the U.S., their owners demand that their bought and rented state legislators and regulators force the public to eat their losses. Arguing for “base load power” or other nonsensical corporate constructs, atomic corporations are gouging the public to keep these radioactive jalopies sputtering along.

Such might have been the fate of Vermont Yankee had it not been for citizen opposition. Opened in the early 1970s, Vermont Yankee was the northern tip of clean energy’s first “golden triangle.” Down the Connecticut River, grassroots opposition successfully prevented two reactors from being built at Montague, Massachusetts, where the term “No Nukes” was coined. A weather tower was toppled, films were made, books were written, demonstrations staged and an upwelling of well-organized grassroots activism helped nurture a rising global movement.

2 comments:

Capt. America said...

Get up to speed on the progress of fusion power generation. There are many alternatives, and almost all of them will work. One very interesting one is a reactor that can be transported on a flatbed truck. It fuses hydrogen and nickel, producing copper, and ten million times as much energy as burning hydrogen would.

The oil, gas, coal, and fission corporations will do anything to stop progress in fusion. Do not expect the corporate media to inform you. As they always have, journalists tell you everything they want you to know, and nothing else.

Anonymous said...

I wouldn't be so optimistic about fusion. Especially the H, Ni to Cu cold fusion generator that appears to take more power to run then it produces.

http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2011/12/05/the-nuclear-physics-of-why-we/