Jennifer Rubin, The Contrarian
- Article I grants Congress the power of the purse, arguably its most effective weapon to
combat executive overreach. Even if Democrats take both houses, it is nearly
impossible, for example, to assemble supermajorities to impeach and remove
rogue Cabinet officials. Even with one house secured, however, it can refuse to
fund Donald Trump’s priorities. And if Democrats win even a bare majority in
the Senate, it can use reconciliation strategically to eliminate programs or
temporarily defund departments. And we’ve got a handy list of Trump’s abusive,
lawless agencies and departments that Democrats should strategically target.
First and foremost, Democrats
should refuse to fund the illegal, reckless Iran War and must eliminate funds
for continued deployment of personnel and material that depletes our readiness
and leaves us vulnerable elsewhere. They can condition
additional funding for the Pentagon on compliance with congressional investigations, and can defund overtly politicized gatherings of the type Secretary of
Defense Pete Hegseth has conducted.
Congress can also use the power
of the purse to disable corrupt, lawless departments. Democrats, for example,
will need to conduct exacting oversight over the Department of Homeland
Security, which has been, according to reports, rife with fraud. Continuing to fund the department before a
full accounting is made and until all those responsible are held accountable
would be political malpractice.
When it comes to abusive, lawless
immigration raids, Democrats must refuse to allocate a single dime for ICE,
Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and other entities responsible for killing or allowing dozens of people to die (on the streets and in custody), mistreating detainees, ignoring fundamental civil liberties protections, refusing to abide by requirements for body cameras, conducting raids at religious institutions, courts, and schools, continuing to use excessive force and racially
profile individuals, and blocking cooperation with state and local criminal
investigations.
If Democrats win control of even
one house, said body can refuse to fund ICE, CBP, and any other aspects of DHS
absent full cooperation with oversight and adoption of strict guidelines on use
of force, treatment of detainees, compliance with warrants, etc. Congress can
simply refuse to fund “raids,” that is, far-flung operations that do not prioritize dangerous criminals. Congress can deny
resources for operations if there is no immediate threat to public safety or in
any case in which ICE agents lack a judicial warrant based on probable cause.
Democrats will need to rally public opinion, already hostile to ICE and CBP, when Trump hollers that
they are protecting “dangerous criminals.” (The response: Democrats will fund
focused, law-abiding enforcement actions that are actually against dangerous
criminals).
No comments:
Post a Comment