Newsweek - As Social Security's financial outlook grows
increasingly concerning, a bipartisan group of lawmakers is reviving a proposal
to require higher-income Americans to pay Social Security taxes on more of
their earnings.
To many, it presents as one of
the least painful ways to shore up the retirement program, but it also could
amount to one of the largest tax increases in decades.
Democratic Senator Elizabeth
Warren and Republican Senator Bernie Moreno wrote in a recent New York Times
op-ed that removing the payroll tax cap would be a “no-brainer” as the Social
Security Administration faces funding insolvency as early as 2032.
According to the latest Social
Security trustees' projections, the program's Old-Age and Survivors Insurance
trust fund is expected to become depleted in the fourth quarter of 2032. If
Congress does nothing, incoming payroll tax revenue would only be sufficient to
pay about 78 percent of scheduled benefits, resulting in an automatic 22
percent cut for retirees and survivors.
Under current law, workers and
employers each pay a 6.2 percent Social Security payroll tax on earnings up to
$184,500 in 2026. However, wages earned above that amount are exempt from
Social Security taxes.
Warren and Moreno are two
lawmakers so far to call for eliminating the cap entirely, arguing that wealthy
Americans should pay Social Security taxes on all earnings rather than stopping
once they exceed the annual threshold.
“Why should a middle-class nurse
pay a larger share of her paycheck — than a wealthy corporate lawyer? This is
doubly unfair in an economy in which top earners’ wages, over time, have pulled
far ahead of those of the average worker,” the senators wrote in their Times
op-ed.
No comments:
Post a Comment