New
Yorker - Recently, the White House announced plans to codify its
campaign of retribution. The proposal, which would dramatically increase the
President’s power over how federal funds are given out, would hand Trump a “new
cudgel” to “advance his partisan agenda and punish political rivals,” a letter
signed by all the Democrats in the Senate charged. “The stakes could not be
higher” is how the legal website Lexology put it.
The proposal in question comes,
not surprisingly, out of the Office of Management and Budget, headed by Russell
Vought, the architect of Project 2025. Titled, innocuously enough, “Regulation
for Federal Financial Assistance,” it would replace the current guidance for
signing off on government grants, which generally leaves the task to civil
servants and peer-review panels. Instead, the final say would go to political
appointees. All discretionary awards from the federal government would have to
be assessed by senior Administration officials, who could deny them on the
ground that they didn’t fit the President’s agenda. Grants could also be
terminated at any time for the same reason.
No comments:
Post a Comment