“If vaccines are working for somebody, I’m not
going to take them away. People ought to have choice, and that choice
ought to be informed by the best information,” he said. “So I’m going to
make sure scientific safety studies and efficacy are out there, and
people can make individual assessments about whether that product is
going to be good for them.”

Washington Post - Donald Trump’s return to the White House signals a significant breakdown of an already battered democracy, experts say. Almost as dangerous, they contend, much of the electorate sees him as democracy’s savior. “We’ve already been in a process over the last 10 years of democratic decay,” said Daniel Ziblatt, a professor of government at Harvard University and co-author of “How Democracies Die,” among other books on the subject. “This election will just hasten that decline.”
Trump — who was impeached twice, convicted of some crimes and charged with others, judged liable for sexual abuse and fined hundreds of millions of dollars in a civil fraud trial — campaigned on instituting sweeping changes to the country, including mass deportations of immigrants, broad-based tariffs, dramatically pared-back climate regulations, and a purge of “deep state” bureaucrats.
But it is not Trump’s individual policy proposals that worry history and democracy scholars as much as his continued denial of reality that he lost the 2020 presidential election and his role in encouraging his supporters on Jan. 6, 2021, who violently stormed the U.S. Capitol. The failure of the courts and Congress to hold him accountable for those actions signals an unofficial takeover of the levers of government by a charismatic, strongman figure who has remade the Republican Party in his image, these democracy scholars say. He is poised to start a second term with broad legal immunity, granted by a reshaped Supreme Court upon which he has exerted significant influence.
Hartmann Report - Our modern era of big money controlling government began in the decade after Richard Nixon put Lewis Powell — the tobacco lawyer who wrote the infamous 1971 “Powell Memo” outlining how billionaires and corporations could take over America — on the Supreme Court in 1972.
In the 1976 Buckley v. Valeo decision, the Court ruled that money used to buy elections wasn’t just cash: they claimed it’s also “free speech” protected by the First Amendment that guarantees your right to speak out on political issues.
In the 200 preceding years — all the way back to the American Revolution of 1776 — no politician or credible political scientist had ever proposed that spending billions to buy votes with dishonest advertising was anything other than simple corruption.
The “originalists” on the Supreme Court, however, claimed to be channeling the Founders of this nation, particularly those who wrote the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, when they said that “money is the same thing as free speech.” In that claim, Republicans on the Court were lying through their teeth.
In a letter to Samuel Kercheval in 1816, President and author of the Declaration of Independence Thomas Jefferson explicitly laid it out:
“Those seeking profits, were they given total freedom, would not be the ones to trust to keep government pure and our rights secure. Indeed, it has always been those seeking wealth who were the source of corruption in government.”
Washington Post - What Trump has promised to do on ‘day one’ as president
NPR - -Trump has remarked that his tariffs would generate enough revenue to fund other aspects of his agenda, NPR’s Scott Horsley says. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates that Trump’s overall economic plans could add nearly $8 trillion to
the federal debt over the next decade. Economists have also noted that
some of his policies, such as the deportation of immigrant farm workers,
could lead to higher prices on things like groceries.
Politico -Donald Trump’s victory means the nation’s first convicted-criminal-turned-president-elect is headed for the White House instead of a prison cell.That’s because Trump’s Nov. 26 sentencing hearing in the hush money case almost certainly won’t happen.“I think any reasonable judge wouldn’t sentence the president-elect,” said Jill Konviser, a retired New York trial judge.
Imposing a sentence now — even a non-prison sentence like home confinement, probation or community service — would interfere with the soon-to-be president’s duties, legal experts say. In theory, the judge who presided over the hush money trial, Justice Juan Merchan, could try to proceed with the sentencing as scheduled and order that any sentence be deferred until 2029, when Trump will complete his term. But even that would pose problems, as Trump’s lawyers are sure to argue that hauling the president-elect into a state courtroom in the middle of the presidential transition would impede the orderly transfer of power.
“His lawyers will say he’s busy with the transition and therefore he won’t show up, and they will ask that any sentencing be adjourned until after the presidency,” predicted former prosecutor Catherine Christian.
Hartmann Report - Donald Trump is preparing to crash the American economy. He intends to do it by tearing up vital parts of our American government. He may even hire Elon Musk to pull it off.And from his point of view, this is not going to be a bad thing. The farther the economy crashes, the greater the buying opportunity for billionaires.
It all has to do with something called the administrative state. While it’s not sexy or even particularly interesting to the average American voter, having a strong administrative state is essential to a high-functioning economy. A strong administrative state is the only thing that protects entrepreneurs and small businesses from being squashed like bugs by monopolistic behemoths, and small businesses are our nation’s main growth engine.
For example, over 70 percent of all new jobs created since 2019 were created by small businesses, producing almost 13 million new jobs over the past 25 years. Small business creation is up 50 percent over Trump’s years because the Biden administration has been enforcing the rule of law, including taking on the giant tech monopolies. Small businesses now account for over 43 percent of all American economic activity.
A
strong administrative state is also the only thing that can protect the
environment from those who’d destroy it for their own profits. It’s the
only thing that can protect consumers from defective or even deadly
products and food or drug contamination. It our only defense against
predatory banks, airlines, and insurance companies, among others. A
strong administrative state that follows and enforces the rule of law —
as opposed to the kind of grift-driven kleptocracies typical of
strongman governments — is essential, in other words, to a functioning
national economy.
Here
in America, we see this best in the contrast between lightly
bureaucratic and largely unregulated Red states and more bureaucratic
and regulated (and taxed) Blue states and counties. While Red and Blue
states are represented in Congress about 50/50, as the Brookings
Institution found a few years ago:
“Biden’s
winning base in 509 counties encompasses fully 71% of America’s
economic activity, while Trump’s losing base of 2,547 counties
represents just 29% of the economy.”
1 comment:
I used the comments section of Steve Ahlquist’s substack to get myself moving on the beginnings of an essay that I need to write about the election. I am starting to feel the US needs to actively learn about political economics as it was once called. greg
What is not being said, what is never said by politicians for fear their paymasters will freak out and give money to someone else., is that the best thing we could do for our economy is go full into climate justice. The investments is super energy efficient, zero carbon housing for the people who are unhoused or who lack adequate safe shelter is one of the things we have to do to create the jobs of the future. Recent studies are pointing out that if the world invests $6Trillion to make the zero carbon transition we save ourselves $36 Trillion on costs from climate disasters and the economic havoc they wreak. Resilience has to start in the most vulnerable places or it does not work well. Period.
The Republicans are in full out lie about the economy and what is needed to create prosperous communities. They are fully committed to climate disasters and economic collapse if it keeps the white supremacists in power. Anyone who took high school physics learns enough to know that climate due to excess carbon burning is no hoax. For Yalies to deny the basic science is to see people in full scale fascist lie mode. Everything they want economically benefits the richest folk and leaves everyone else in big trouble. Their climate strategy is already killing thousands of people in the USA and hundreds of thousands around the world.
The Democrats also refuse to tell the truth about the economy. they know we need to invest in the transitions and resilience, and some of them know that public investment needs to go into the lowest income neighborhoods first to create prosperous communities. And some of them would even admit how much investment is needed. But they are unable to actually articulate such a plan to do it because it is politically unpopular, even if absolutely necessary. But it is politically unpopular as no one has really ever tried in a campaign to really educate the public about the way the economy actually works and how to intervene. The backlash from the moneyed class ties their hands. So one side lies and manipulates media into touting the party line in support of the richest, and the Dems tie their own hands and say nothing.
Post a Comment