From our
overstocked archives
Sam
Smith, 2008 - During
the long years of southern segregation, the white establishment managed to
convince poor whites that it was blacks rather than itself that posed the
biggest threat. This was not only immoral, it was a con, and a miserably
effective one.
Only
occasionally was the myth challenged, as when Earl Long went after black votes
while holding onto his low income white constituency. When Long was elected in
1948 there were only 7,000 black voters in Louisiana. By the time he left
office a decade later, there were 110,000.
It was not
that Governor Long was any moral model. His language, for example, would have
shocked today's white and black liberals. What he did do, and quite well, was
to put together people who many at the top didn't want together. And at a time
when the likes of Lyndon Johnson and William Fulbright were carefully avoiding
the race issue, Long took on the White Citizens Council.
I was
reminded of this the other day when Howard Dean made his comment about wanting
to get the votes of people who drove pickups with confederate flag stickers. He
was immediately excoriated but what he was doing was simply reaching out to a
constituency that Democratic liberals have too long dissed, the less successful
white male. Uncle Earl would have been pleased.
In fact, the
best way to change people's minds about matters such as ethnic relations is to
put them in situations that challenge their presumptions. Like joining a
multicultural political coalition that works. Its change produced by shared
experience rather than morality by revelation.
Martin
Luther King understood this as he admonished his aides to include in their
dreams the hope that their present opponents would become their future friends.
And he realized that rules of correct behavior were insufficient:
"Something
must happen so as to touch the hearts and souls of men that they will come
together, not because the law says it, but because it is natural and
right."
This doesn't
happen logically, it doesn't come all at once, and it doesn't come with pretty
words. Tom Lowe of the Jackson
Progressive voted a couple of years ago in favor of a new Mississippi flag
without the confederate symbolism. But in retrospect, he wrote later, he
realized that the voters' rejection of the change was a honest reflection of
their state of mind: "Perhaps a time will come when we have truly put
aside our nasty streak of racism. When that time arrives, maybe we will choose
to replace the flag with something more representative of our ideals. On the
other hand, when we reach that point, we may no longer care about the symbolism
of the Confederate battle flag. Or perhaps we will keep it for another reason:
to make those of us that are white humble by reminding us of our less than
honorable past."
Or perhaps
do what the whites in the Southern Student Organizing Committee did at the
beginning of the civil rights movement: seize the old symbol for a new purpose.
The SSOC logo showed a black and white hand firmly clasped across a confederate
flag. It is, within my extensive button collection, a favorite because it
illustrates how symbols can be transformed and used for better purposes. Yes,
the confederate flag is still there, but firmly in the background, reminding
one of how hard won were the clasped hands in front.
The decline
of liberalism has been accelerated by the growing number of American
subcultures deemed unworthy by its advocates: gun owners, church goers, pickup
drivers with confederate flag stickers. Yet the gun owner could be an important
ally for civil liberties, the churchgoer a voice for political integrity, the
pickup driver a supporter of national healthcare.
We'll never
know until we try. Dean, coming off some successful approaches to black voters,
has now turned to another group the establishment, including its liberal
branch, doesn't really give much of damn about: the struggling white male.
These two groups are primarily antagonistic because they have been taught to
see life that way by those who really don't want them getting along. Instead of
inveighing in the best liberal fashion against all stereotypes save one's own, Dean
is mixing things up a bit. A Dean bumper sticker next to a confederate flag on
a pickup may not be utopia, but it would be sure sign of positive change which,
these days, would be a pretty big change in itself. -
The irony is
that despite crude terminology, politics is one of the few places where you
actually see people working voluntarily across ethnic and class lines for a
common goal.
It is also
interesting to note, as William Saletan does in Slate, that Dean received quite
a different reception before he was the frontrunner. Here's what he told the
Democratic National Committee last February:
"I
intend to talk about race during this election in the South. The Republicans
have been talking about it since 1968 in order to divide us, and I'm going to
bring us together. Because you know what? White folks in the South who drive
pickup trucks with Confederate flag decals on the back ought to be voting with
us because their kids don't have health insurance either, and their kids need
better schools too."
Writes
Saletan: "I have that speech on videotape. I'm looking at it right now. As
Dean delivers the line about Confederate flags, the whole front section of the
audience stands and applauds. It's a pretty white crowd, but in slow-motion
playback, I can make out three black people in the crowd and two more on the
dais, including DNC Vice Chair Lottie Shackelford. Every one of them is
standing and applauding. As Dean finishes his speech, a dozen more black
spectators rise to join in an ovation. They show no doubt or unease about what
Dean meant."
The Dean
controversy is driven by several factors. One is the growing liberal preference
for proper language and symbolism over proper policy. Thus confederate flags
soar above such other possible issues as the drug war with its disastrous
effect on young black males, discrimination in housing and public
transportation, and the lack of blacks in the U.S. Senate. Further, while
liberals are happy to stigmatize certain stereotypes, they are enthralled with
others, such as the self-serving suggestion that they represent a new class of
"cultural creatives" saving the American city. And from whom,
implicitly, are they saving the American city? From the blacks, latinos and
poor forced out to make way for their creativity.
Another
factor has far deeper roots: our fear of public discussion of class issues.
Although this has repeatedly been noted by both black and white observers, it
has little effect on our politics or the media, both of which project the myth
that ethnic conflict occurs independent of economic divisions.
One who
understood otherwise was the black writer, Jean Toomer - who once described
America as "so voluble in acclamation of the democratic ideal, so reticent
in applying what it professes." Writing in 1919, Toomer said, "It is
generally established that the causes of race prejudice may primarily be found
in the economic structure that compels one worker to compete against another
and that furthermore renders it advantageous for the exploiting classes to inculcate,
foster, and aggravate that competition."
Dean's real
sin was that he got too close to that topic.
No comments:
Post a Comment