August 5, 2015

Three top Rand Paul associates indicted

Mother Jones - After years of investigation by the Department of Justice, three top Rand Paul associates, including the senator's nephew-in-law, were indicted for their role in an alleged attempt to buy an influential Iowa state senator's endorsement of Ron Paul during his 2012 presidential campaign. None of these operatives, who served as top Ron Paul campaign aides, is currently on the payroll of Rand Paul's presidential campaign. But two of them—Jesse Benton, who is married to Paul's niece, and John Tate—run a pro-Rand Paul super-PACs that has raised $3.1 million to support Paul's presidential campaign.* The third man indicted, Dimitri Kesari, has served as an aide to both Rand Paul and his father.

Last year, former Republican Iowa state Sen. Kent Sorenson pleaded guilty to campaign finance charges accusing him of helping to cover up a scheme for the Ron Paul campaign to pay him more than $70,000 to switch his endorsement immediately before the 2012 Iowa caucus, from Michele Bachmann to Ron Paul. Sorenson has been awaiting sentencing pending his cooperation in a further investigation, but it hasn't been clear who on Ron Paul's staff would be caught up in the scandal. At the time Benton served as the campaign's chairman, Tate as the campaign manager, and Kesari as the deputy campaign manager.

All three men were charged with criminal conspiracy and federal charges related to falsification of government records. Tate and Benton face charges of making false statements to federal investigators; Kesari was indicted on one count of obstruction of justice for allegedly trying to persuade Sorenson to deny the scheme when pressed by prosecutors.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is a head scratcher. If I want to sell my endorsement for a margerine or a politician that's my freedom to contract. After McCutcheon, it should be unconstitutional for government to restrain this form of corruption. This is a show prosecution to cover up the real casino action involving billions. This is like a mob casino ejecting a math professor for counting cards at the black jack table.

Anonymous said...

This is a head scratcher. If I want to sell my endorsement for a margerine or a politician that's my freedom to contract

Not really. For a margarine, sure. But for a politician only if we admit political office is a commercial product. They haven't subdued us enough to make it safe to be as open as that.