Robert Parry, Consortrium News - From the start of the Ukraine crisis in fall 2013, the New York Times, the Washington Post and virtually every mainstream U.S. news outlet have behaved as dishonestly as they did during the run-up to war with Iraq. Objectivity and other principles of journalism have been thrown out the window. The larger context of both Ukrainian politics and Russia’s role has been ignored.
Again, it’s all been about demonized “bad guys” – in this case, Ukraine’s elected President Viktor Yanukovych and Russia’s elected President Vladimir Putin – versus the “pro-Western good guys” who are deemed model democrats even as they collaborated with neo-Nazis to overthrow a constitutional order.
The political is made personal: Yanukovych had a pricy sauna in his mansion; Putin rides a horse shirtless and doesn’t favor gay rights. So, if you raise questions about U.S. support for last year’s coup in Ukraine, you somehow must favor pricy saunas, riding shirtless and holding bigoted opinions about gays.
Anyone who dares protest the unrelentingly one-sided coverage is deemed a “Putin apologist” or a “stooge of Moscow.” So, most Americans – in a position to influence public knowledge but who want to stay employable – stay silent, just as they did during the Iraq War stampede.
One of the ugly but sadly typical cases relates to Russia scholar Stephen F. Cohen, who has been denounced by some of the usual neocon suspects for deviating from the “group think” that blames the entire Ukraine crisis on Putin. The New Republic, which has gotten pretty much every major issue wrong during my 37 years in Washington, smeared Cohen as “Putin’s American toady.”
Cohen noted,,,, that even established foreign policy figures, ex-National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski and former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, have been accused in the Washington Post of “advocating that the West appease Russia,” with the notion of “appeasement” meant “to be disqualifying, chilling, censorious.” (Kissinger had objected to the comparison of Putin to Hitler as unfounded.)
In other words, as the United States rushes into a new Cold War with Russia, we are seeing the makings of a new McCarthyism, challenging the patriotism of anyone who doesn’t get into line. But this conformity of thought presents a serious threat to U.S. national security and even the future of the planet.
3 comments:
Does anyone know what US policy is? What are we doing in Kiev? Even Dr. Strangelove is nervous.
Who really is in control of U.S. foreign policy?
There's been no debate on Ukraine.
Andrew Bacevich argues Obama has lost any honorable foreign policy legacy he'd hoped to achieve because managers he's got are incompetent.
http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/9403672/barack-obama-anatomy-of-a-failure/
I'm not a fan of Alex Jones or infowars but I do like Kurt Nimo:
Color revolution collaboration began soon after engineered fall of Soviet Union
http://www.infowars.com/soros-admits-responsibility-for-coup-and-mass-murder-in-ukraine/
George Soros’ Giant Globalist Footprint in Ukraine’s Turmoil
http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/17843-george-soros-s-giant-globalist-footprint-in-ukraine-s-turmoil
From 2004:
Ukraine: The Clockwork Orange Revolution
http://www.david-morrison.org.uk/ukraine/clockwork-orange-revolution.htm
Post a Comment