January 1, 2017

Wall Street Journal editor won't use "lie" to describe Trump's lies

Huffington Post - Wall Street Journal Editor-in-Chief Gerard Baker said his newspaper would not refer to false statements from the Trump administration as “lies,” because doing so would ascribe a “moral intent” to the statements.

Baker appeared on NBC’s “Meet The Press” Sunday, where he described some of President-elect Donald Trump’s falsehoods as “questionable” and “challengeable.” But, he said, “I’d be careful about using the word ‘lie.’ ‘Lie’ implies much more than just saying something that’s false. It implies a deliberate intent to mislead.”

He said reporters should state the facts, but leave classifying them to readers, citing the example of Trump’s claim that thousands of Muslims in New Jersey were celebrating on 9/11 (which is false).

The New York Times editorial board has used “lie” to describe Trump’s rampant abuse of facts. And Washington Post conservative columnist Jennifer Rubin has taken the media to task for not using the word. Other outlets - including MSNBC, New York Magazine and HuffPost - will use the word when it’s merited.

But Baker said that in doing so, “you run the risk that you look like you are, you’re not being, objective.”

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Is this what the media has become. A tool for the rich and powerful to say whatever they want without a filter. A lie is clearly a deliberate intent of mislead. The fact that they want 2 sides to a story should not be what the media is about. There are truths, and there are lies, period! The WSJ should surrender its media credentials.