Religious communities should be able to have civil partnerships too. That's my objection to calling any and everything "marriage".
My other problem is that if about half of marriages end in divorce, what happens when same-sex divorces, in substantial numbers, start showing up in the courts? Incidentally, guess who pays? Do you really think that couples without the advantage of compatible plumbing have an even chance of success? What is adultery? What is alienation of affection? What is consummation? I think that same-sex sex should be kept as far from the courts as possible.
Making perversion not illegal should be good enough. The Napoleonic code was a better way to go in getting religion out of the legal issues completely.
Religious communities should be able to have civil partnerships too. That's my objection to calling any and everything "marriage".
ReplyDeleteMy other problem is that if about half of marriages end in divorce, what happens when same-sex divorces, in substantial numbers, start showing up in the courts? Incidentally, guess who pays? Do you really think that couples without the advantage of compatible plumbing have an even chance of success? What is adultery? What is alienation of affection? What is consummation? I think that same-sex sex should be kept as far from the courts as possible.
Making perversion not illegal should be good enough. The Napoleonic code was a better way to go in getting religion out of the legal issues completely.