 |
Air quality |
Inside
Climate News - Attribution science measures how much human-caused
global warming loaded the dice for an extreme weather event, making it more
likely or more intense. Recent research shows climate extremes, like the deadly
2021 heat dome over the Pacific Northwest and this summer’s early heat wave in
Europe that killed more than 5,000 people, would have been impossible without
human-caused warming.
To determine how global warming affects an extreme event,
researchers compare its intensity and likelihood in the current climate with
the same event modeled in a world without human-caused emissions. A combination
of observational data, weather and climate models and statistical models help
quantify the effect of human-caused warming on the extreme event.
In the report, the authors wrote that attribution scientists
should develop shared standards for studying extreme events so different
research groups can more easily compare and verify one another’s results. It
also recommended regularly reviewing the rapid attribution studies now issued
within days of major disasters to ensure the methods keep pace with advances in
climate science.
The report says the next big advances will come from more
powerful climate models that can better simulate localized extremes such as
severe thunderstorms and hail, along with improved weather and impact data,
especially in parts of the world where observations remain limited. It also
urges scientists to work more closely with local officials and communities so
attribution studies can better inform disaster planning, recovery and estimates
of climate-related losses
No comments:
Post a Comment