The rich are living longer
Thanks to Trump 45% of latinos see GOP as hostile, up from 18% in 2012
Clinton and Sanders refuse to choose between Apple and FBI
One thing to do if Donald Trump wins . . . . But what if Canadian Ted Cruz shows up?
2 comments:
The Apple case is a lot of hot air and distraction.
LA Times and other sources report that the phone in question was a work, apparently owned by the County Health Department and issued to employees with the understanding that said phones are searchable---where's the real issue, then? The Fourth Amendment guarantees against unreasonable searches. Are the FBI requests in this one situation unreasonable?
LA Times follow-up article:
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-apple-fbi-motion-to-compel-20160219-story.html
Salient point from above linked article:
"With Farook dead and his employer, which owns the iPhone, consenting to the search, the requested software would not invade anyone’s privacy and wouldn’t undermine encryption, prosecutors contend."
Post a Comment