tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018073541417646773.post1340148395760837319..comments2024-03-27T19:00:02.499-04:00Comments on UNDERNEWS: The difference between nominations and jury trialsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018073541417646773.post-10641004167373723042017-01-11T21:44:29.607-05:002017-01-11T21:44:29.607-05:00It's not what Trump did that's the problem...It's not what Trump did that's the problem. It's that he did it where Russians could record the act and use it to blackmail him. AgustinGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02854181298679375907noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018073541417646773.post-75241976545464772652017-01-11T15:33:30.763-05:002017-01-11T15:33:30.763-05:00In the 1st place, I don't know that you can...In the 1st place, I don't know that you can't be a decent or honorable person and like to watch women urinate. It's not my thing, but I wouldn't condemn a person for it, and it's certainly safer than the sex act itself (gay or straight). I just read a bio on Margaret Sanger, and her social reformer friend Havelock Ellis apparently had just this fetish, and yet by most accounts he was a decent man in other respects. <br /><br />2nd, Trump's done far worse things and the people knew it when they elected him. I don't like it that we're ruled by a vulgar misogynist, but apparently a lot of people do, and to paraphrase Senator Hruska, aren't a--holes entitled to representation as well? If not, don't we have to concede that democracy is a mistake?<br /><br />I do agree that his cabinet appointments shouldn't be approved just because the evidence doesn't meet trial standards.<br /><br />--SydAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com