December 20, 2012

Lieberman does something right on his way out

In 1970 your editor wrote the first article arguing for DC statehood and explaining how it could be achieved without a constituional amendment. He was also one of the founders of the DC statehood movement. 

Huffington Post - A bill moving the District of Columbia toward statehood has been introduced in the Senate.

On Wednesday, retiring Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), and Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), introduced the bill, which would allow D.C. voters to "endorse" statehood.

As first reported by Buzzfeed, the 51st state would be called New Columbia, and would be granted full voting representation in the Senate and in the House of Representatives. The National Mall, the Capitol, federal monuments, and certain other parts of the District occupied by government buildings would not become part of this new state, but would remain under federal control. This federal area -- still called the District of Columbia -- would remain the nation's capital.

3 comments:

Capt. America said...

No, it's not the right way to go. The right way to go is for DC to become part of Maryland again.

xilii said...

There's already occasional confusion between Washington the state and Washington, D.C. and the best they could come up with was "New Columbia?" Lame. This bill looks like an end of the year symbolic gesture created by a retiring senator.

Anonymous said...

Capt. America wrote: The right way to go is for DC to become part of Maryland again.

Agreed. Only if there's a national decision to turn all big cities into their own states should DC be promoted.