November 18, 2012

Wal-Mart getting worried

Daily Kos - [Wal Mart has] filed an unfair labor practice charge against the United Food and Commercial Workers, the union with which non-union Walmart worker groups are affiliated. That's not a tactic Walmart would bother with if it was confident it could crush these workers' spirits as it's accustomed to doing.

Activities over the past year or longer "have caused disruptions to Walmart's business, resulted in misinformation being shared publicly about our company, and created an uncomfortable environment and undue stress on Walmart's customers, including families with children," Walmart outside counsel Steven Wheeless said in a letter sent on Friday to Deborah Gaydos, assistant general counsel of the UFCW.
You know what creates an uncomfortable environment and undue stress on people, including families with children? Walmart's ridiculously low pay scale and scanty opportunities for advancement, such that, according to internal company documents:
Low-level workers typically start near minimum wage, and have the potential to earn raises of 20 to 40 cents an hour through incremental promotions. Flawless performance merits a 60 cent raise per year under the policy, regardless of how much time an employee has worked for the company. As a result, a "solid performer" who starts at Walmart as a cart pusher making $8 an hour and receives one promotion, about the average rate, can expect to make $10.60 after working at the company for 6 years.
That, combined with policies intentionally keeping workers at part-time hours so they don't qualify for benefits, is why so many Walmart employees are forced to rely on food stamps and other public assistance to make ends meet. Being kept poor is the sort of thing that causes families with children just a little more distress than being exposed to workers picketing outside of stores.

Walmart's dismissive statements about the small percentage of workers taking part in the protests are accurate in a literal sense, but the decision to try to use the law to shut the protests down reveals that something bigger than the percentages is going on: this is the first time Walmart has faced such sustained, defiant activism against its abuses of workers. Usually when workers have tried to fight the conditions they face, retaliation and intimidation from managers have been enough to shut it down. That's not working this time, and as the protests spread and draw public notice, it seems that executives are nervous enough to go beyond their usual tactics. And when they're nervous, it's time to double down.


Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

Thirty years ago everybody knew WalMart was owned by Sam Walton... Good ol' boy just like you and me who drove an old pickup truck and enjoyed the company of his dog Roy.

Down here in Bubbaland no one thought much about how Sam got so freakin' rich selling at rock bottom prices, they were just glad he did because a three pack of Dial soap was 20 cents cheaper than the Rexall Drug Store.

Then the Rexall went out of business. And the price of soap went up. And Sam Walton died, along with main street in hundreds of small towns with a WalMart.

Took a good long while, but I think Bubbaland might be on the verge of figuring out Wally World is all about the money. And it was a big, aggressive, and avaricious corporation for a lot longer than small town America realized.

They wanted to believe in the Waltons. Same as they wanted to believe in supply side economics and faith based government.

They got screwed for their naivete. Big Time. And they know it.

Now WalMart is concerned... And they should be... Because nothing is worse than your market base realizing they've been abused for decades and have nothing to lose by telling the local Super Center to f'off.